Kentucky Derby Odds & Ends

Kentucky Derby Odds & Ends: Pneumatic is Out (for now); Fans (not a lot) are In; Hold all Tickets (legal twist)

By Mike Farrell

With less than three weeks to go before the Kentucky Derby (G1) on Sept. 5 — four months later than its traditional first Saturday in May — here’s some thoughts and observations on this unusual Run for the Roses:

No Pneumatic

Must say we are sorry to hear that Pneumatic will bypass the Derby and wait for the Preakness (G1) on Oct. 3. He easily won the Pegasus Stakes on Saturday at Monmouth Park, the final race on the Road to the Kentucky Derby. The 20 additional points he picked up for the Pegasus victory clinched a spot in the Derby.

His connections, Winchell Thoroughbreds and trainer Steve Asmussen, are leaning toward giving the colt additional time following his first stakes victory.


Pneumatic – Photo Courtesy of Ryan Denver/EQUI-PHOTO.

We always want to see the horse’s best interests placed first but, from a selfish perspective, Pneumatic would have been an interesting Derby entrant.

He is lightly raced and only starting to scratch his potential. He would have offered intriguing Derby value as a medium-priced runner in the 8-1 to 12-1 range. Not that he’s ready to unseat Tiz the Law but Pneumatic could have filled a slot on a trifecta or superfecta ticket at a nice price.

If the odds were enticing enough, a few bucks on the nose to pull a Derby upset would have been in order.

It’s still possible the Pneumatic camp will catch a dose of Derby Fever (it’s been known to happen) but for now, we’ll see him in October.

Yes, there will be fans

The mainstream media seemed shocked and stunned by the announcement that Churchill Downs will admit fans on Derby Day. Just not the usual throng.

The event that usually attracts over 150,000 fans will be limited to somewhere around 23,000 to allow for social distancing.

For some folks, the idea that 23,000 will congregate in one location is inconceivable given the current coronavirus admonitions to shun thy neighbor. College football conferences are cancelling their seasons and gatherings are still limited to 50 or few people in many areas.

From a racing fan’s perspective, seeing only 23,000 in cavernous Churchill Downs will be equally shocking. The infield will be empty and spectators in their rose-colored masks will be well spaced.

What’s a Derby without massive traffic jams and wall-to-wall people?

Churchill will pull out all the stops to ensure a safe experience for all who attend. Let’s hope the day goes off without a hitch. If the plans work, Derby Day could be a baby step on the road back to normalcy for all sports.

Churchill has also installed protocols covering jockeys which will scramble the riding assignments on Derby weekend.

Stay tuned, as there will be developments on that front.

Hold all tickets takes legal turn

The first bit of advice given novice horseplayers is “hold all tickets until the race is declared official.”

Fair enough. You don’t want to discard a ticket that could become a winner if the order-of-finish is upended by a disqualification, or in other instances, refunds are issued when a horse is declared a non-starter.

Waiting for the “official” sign on the tote board or television monitor has always been the horseplayer’s best move.

Kentucky Derby Qualifiers: Fountain of Youth Favorites

Horse Racing – US Racing Photo

In our increasingly litigious world, bettors need to hold those tickets … forever, now that the courts have intervened.

A harness bettor recently received a $20,000 settlement after suing the connections of a horse that won a race at the Meadowlands in 2016 but ultimately tested positive for a banned drug.

Bettors usually have no recourse after the fact. Not this time

The bettor, located in Illinois, sued claiming interstate racketeering after he made a superfecta wager that did not include the winner. His horses finished second, third, fourth and fifth. By his calculation, his payoff should have been over $30,000 had the doped horse been disqualified or banned.

If the precedent stands, the impact will be far ranging.

For starters, It would help “clean up” racing. Cheaters would have less incentive if they faced potential lawsuits.

Trainers and owners might need malpractice insurance, similar to what doctors purchase, to shield them financially in the event of an intentional or accidental post-race positive in one of their horses.

That added expense would drive many honest horsemen out of the sport.

The bettors might not benefit, either. Racing has always operated on the “and now we move on” principle. After one race is posted official, we move to the next one in the program. Winners from the previous race cash the tickets at the track or off-track-betting parlor and on-line players see winnings immediately credited to their accounts.

That creates “the churn” that supports the game. The money returned as winnings is re-bet over and over again.

What would happen if nobody got paid until the race was truly official, when all the postrace blood and urine tests were cleared by the labs? Winners would wait days, possibly weeks, before cashing.

No churn equals no racing.

That would suit PETA just fine. The radical animal rights group dedicated to the destruction of horseracing provided the financial backing for the Illinois bettor to launch the lawsuit.

Unable to achieve its goals in the court of public opinion, PETA took a backdoor stab at employing the legal system to do its dirty work.

They chalked up a victory. Where it leads is a very uncertain path.